Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!sungate!glen
From: glen@sungate.UUCP (Glen Barney)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix.sco
Subject: Re: Older versions of SCO Xenix
Message-ID: <340@sungate.UUCP>
Date: 25 Jan 91 13:32:02 GMT
References: <91JBw1w163w@cynic.wimsey.bc.ca>
Organization: sungate! where the magic still lives...
Lines: 23

In article <91JBw1w163w@cynic.wimsey.bc.ca>, curt@cynic.wimsey.bc.ca (Curt Sampson) writes:
> I'm getting ahold of an older version, 2.1.1, of SCO Xenix 286 very
> cheaply. My question is, how different is it from 2.3.2, and how might
> this affect the installation of common programs such as rn and C news?

With respect to communications, at least, the most important difference
is the fact that 2.3.2 has a new HoneyDanBer version of uucp, whereas the
2.1.x releases had the old uucp.  I run 2.1.3 on an XT-86 (that was the
last version for the XT) and have no problems with the older uucp for
sending and receiving mail; however, I've been unable to test news on it -
it's just a mail gateway.

> Is it worth it to spend a few hundred dollars and get 2.3.2, if I have
> that option?  Or can I get by fine with 2.1.1?

Both are correct.  You can get by fine with 2.1.1; however, it's in your
interest to run 2.3.2 simply because it's a much richer environment and
has a lot more features.
-- 
--*--  --*--  --*--  --*--  --*--  --*--  --*--  --*--  --*--  --*--  --*--
Glen / sungate! 301-330-4700         It'll take time, but we're going far...
BangPath: uunet!sungate!glen         you and me, I know we are... In time,
InterNet: glen%sungate@uunet.UU.NET  we'll be dancing in the streets all night