Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!think.com!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!relay.nswc.navy.mil!oasys!mimsy!mojo!eng.umd.edu!stripes
From: stripes@eng.umd.edu (Joshua Osborne)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: Motif/Openlook, is there a trend?
Message-ID: <1991Jan23.230814.28762@eng.umd.edu>
Date: 23 Jan 91 23:08:14 GMT
References: <9101221559.AA16978@sun.soe.clarkson.edu>
Sender: news@eng.umd.edu (C-News)
Reply-To: stripes@eng.umd.edu (Joshua Osborne)
Organization: College of Engineering, Maryversity of Uniland, College Park
Lines: 25

In article <9101221559.AA16978@sun.soe.clarkson.edu>, abstine@sun.soe.clarkson.edu (Arthur Stine) writes:
> From article <1335@west.West.Sun.COM>, by saunders@gesundheit.West.Sun.COM (Gene Saunders):
[...]
> > 		OpenLook	Motif		NeXT		OS/2 PM
[...]
> > 	total	60		28		23		22
> 
> I attended this year's X conference and in the tutorial I attended on
> application builders/UIMS, the question was posed as to who was building
> products, etc using Motif vs OpenLook. Out of probably some 200+ people in
> the room, the majority (maybe 80%) were using Motif and maybe few dozen
> were using OpenLook. Kind of interesting, albeit not very scientific,
> statistics...

Mabie the people using Motif arn't done yet, while the other 20% are...
   :-)

(all jokeing aside, Motif does _try_ to do a good job documating Motif, where Sun
just relyes on O' Reilly Vol 7 to teach you everything...)
-- 
           stripes@eng.umd.edu          "Security for Unix is like
      Josh_Osborne@Real_World,The          Multitasking for MS-DOS"
      "The dyslexic porgramer"                  - Kevin Lockwood
"CNN is the only nuclear capable news network..."
    - lbruck@eng.umd.edu (Lewis Bruck)