Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!rex!uflorida!gatech!bloom-beacon!dont-send-mail-to-path-lines From: Kevin.N.Broekhoven@queensu.ca Newsgroups: comp.windows.x Subject: X Windows and Unix SysVR4 Message-ID: <4450*Kevin.N.Broekhoven@QueensU.CA> Date: 28 Jan 91 15:22:00 GMT Sender: daemon@athena.mit.edu (Mr Background) Organization: The Internet Lines: 33 Date: Fri, 18 Jan 1991 11:24:00 Message-Id: 4437:Kevin.N.Broekhoven@QueensU.CA From: Kevin.N.Broekhoven@QueensU.CA To: xpert@athena.mit.edu Subject: X Windows and Unix SysVR4 * *-------------------------------------------------------------------------* * I sent this message last week to xpert, but received no indication it had * * arrived -- sorry for any duplicate postings, if a mail link suddenly goes * * "up" and delivers all of my mail in a batch. * * *-------------------------------------------------------------------------* I know that OpenLook is part of the SysVR4 specification, and that OpenLook is currently implemented using the X11 protocol. However is X11 part of the SysVR4 specification? Would these guys be free to implement OpenLook with some other windowing system in the future, or is the X11 component of the specification cast in stone? Similarly, Motif is (will be?) part of the OSF/1 operating system spec. Motif is currently implemented with X11. Is X11 a fixed part of the OSF/Motif spec, or could OSF change to another windowing protocol in the future? thanks in advance, Kevin Broekhoven Computing Centre applications programmer Queens University K7L-3N6 (Canada) Bitnet, NetNorth: BROEKHVN@QUCDN IP: kevin@ccs.QueensU.CA (130.15.48.9) X.400: Kevin.Broekhoven@QueensU.CA Bell: (613) 545-2235 fax: 545-6798 Kevin Broekhoven Computing Centre applications programmer Queens University K7L-3N6 (Canada) Bitnet, NetNorth: BROEKHVN@QUCDN IP: kevin@ccs.QueensU.CA (130.15.48.9) X.400: Kevin.Broekhoven@QueensU.CA Bell: (613) 545-2235 fax: 545-6798