Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!sdd.hp.com!spool2.mu.edu!uunet!olivea!oliveb!bunker!hcap!hnews!119!5.0!Donald.Roberts
From: Donald.Roberts@p0.f5.n119.z1.fidonet.org (Donald Roberts)
Newsgroups: misc.handicap
Subject: screen readers
Message-ID: <17143@bunker.UUCP>
Date: 23 Jan 91 15:26:36 GMT
Sender: wtm@bunker.UUCP
Reply-To: Donald.Roberts@p0.f5.n119.z1.fidonet.org
Distribution: misc
Organization: FidoNet node 1:119/5.0 - Lazarus, Chico CA
Lines: 18
Approved: wtm@bunker.UUCP

Index Number: 13154

[This is from the Blink Talk Conference]

I've seen several messages from various persons stating that the screen 
reader they use is superior to Vert.  This may well be true.  But I 
would greatly appreciate it if persons making such claims would tell me 
the specific areas in which they believe their particular reader is 
superior.  I use Soft Vert in conjunction with Accent speech and have 
been very pleased with the results.  I have also seen Vocal Eyes and 
think it is great.  I am using the 4.5 version of Soft Vert and it 
appearss to me to have features which are comparable to Vocal Eyes.  I 
would appreciate anyone's input regarding the differences between the 
two programs.  Thanks.

--
Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!119!5.0!Donald.Roberts
Internet: Donald.Roberts@p0.f5.n119.z1.fidonet.org