Xref: utzoo misc.consumers:26339 sci.electronics:17238 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!csn!uswat!ken From: ken@uswat.uswest.com (Kenny Chaffin) Newsgroups: misc.consumers,sci.electronics Subject: Re: Cable Competition at Last! Keywords: Direct Broadcast Coming Soon Message-ID: <14771@uswat.UUCP> Date: 25 Jan 91 20:41:22 GMT References: <620@wybbs.mi.org-> <1991Jan25.183121.9017@rodan.acs.syr.edu> Sender: news@uswat.UUCP Distribution: na Organization: US WEST Advanced Technologies, CO, USA Lines: 50 In article <1991Jan25.183121.9017@rodan.acs.syr.edu-> amichiel@rodan.acs.syr.edu (Allen J Michielsen) writes: ->In article <620@wybbs.mi.org> ken@wybbs.mi.org (Ken) writes: ->>This weeks Engineering times has an article on something I have been -> ->>Starting this summer, a company called Sky Pix (Kent, WA) will be ->>selling a direct broadcast dish system for the home. Dishes have ->>been around for a long time, but check out these details: -> Pretty good description, but sorry. All of this was available in the ->30 largest us cities more than 5 years ago. The single difference was that ->the antenna pointed to the tallest building downtown for it's 'sat' signal, ->and downtown, the 'sat' sales company used down link dishes to create the ->artificial sat. -> In short, except for a very few locations (maybe zero). They've all gone ->bankrupt in short order. They discovered a lot of things, one of which was ->that you can't compete with the costs for most cable companies, and people that ->are willing to are willing to spend the money for a real dish. The costs of ->launching the sat and cost for the startup are so astronomical that unless the ->government foot the bill and holds everybody's hand, it a belly up deal. -> ->al -> -> ->-- ->Al. Michielsen, Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Syracuse University -> InterNet: amichiel@rodan.acs.syr.edu amichiel@sunrise.acs.syr.edu -> Bitnet: AMICHIEL@SUNRISE Yeah, But... There are considerable differences. One the downlink is actually owned and operated by the user-- that eliminates considerable cost. The other is that things have changed considerably in the past 5 years satellite time is much cheaper and more efficient. The Japanese and others are going all out for direct broadcast HDTV, and I believe some places in Europe also. There is always a risk in any business but I would hope that the japanese and this new company here in the U S are aware of history and still see it as a positive proposition. In any case, we'll watch and see what happens. KAC "Anybody want a drink before the war?" Sinead O'Connor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kenny A. Chaffin {...boulder}!uswat!ken U S WEST Advanced Technologies (303) 930-5356 6200 South Quebec Englewood, CO 80111 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<