Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!cbnews!cbnews!military From: bxr307@csc.anu.edu.au Newsgroups: sci.military Subject: Re: ASRAAM (air to air missile) Message-ID: <1991Jan24.041830.23907@cbnews.att.com> Date: 24 Jan 91 04:18:30 GMT References: <1991Jan22.015553.20458@cbnews.att.com> Sender: military@cbnews.att.com (William B. Thacker) Organization: Computer Services, Australian National University Lines: 38 Approved: military@att.att.com From: bxr307@csc.anu.edu.au In article <1991Jan22.015553.20458@cbnews.att.com>, cem@cs.brown.edu (Charles E. Moylan) writes: > > > From: cem@cs.brown.edu (Charles E. Moylan) > > Does anyone know if the european ASRAAM (advanced short-range air-to-air > missile) program is still in existence? I had heard that it was canceled > in favor of upgrading the AIM-9 Sidewinder. Is this true? The ASRAAM was developed under an agreement between the US and the European members of NATO. The USAF was to be responsible for the development of BVR missiles and the Europeans the development of the short range weapons. ASRAAM was intended to replace the AIM-9 Sidewinder and was meant to be easily fitted to the same launch rails without any adaptors. However the Europeans decided to produce the ASRAAM with a large adaptor rail which contained the electronics interface and cooling bottle for the systems IR homing system. The USAF complained when the weapon was presented to them and threatened to pull out of the agreement. The Europeans quickly went back to their drawing boards and redesigned the missile. They increased the diametre of the weapon to allow it to carry all electronics and cooling supplies internally. However the USAF has still be dragging its feet at agreeing to production of the weapon. In addition the German government (before reunification) decided that the system's costs were spiralling too quickly and announced its withdrawal from the program. This left Britain, Italy and Spain basically carrying the cost. As a consequence the system is, as far as I know, in limbo. The other countries have not yet decided to cancel it yet, however it is most probably on the cards. As a consequence a private venture was begun last year between Marconi Avionics of the UK and Matra of France to produce a possible replacement. Designated Mica-ASRAAM it makes use of developments gained from work done on ASRAAM. They have placed an unsolicited proposal to the UK MoD who is considering it in light of the problems faced by the ASRAAM program. Brian Ross