Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!lethe!yunexus!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!apple!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!cbnews!cbnews!military
From: cga66@ihlpy.att.com (Patrick V Kauffold)
Newsgroups: sci.military
Subject: Possible sub mission (was SSN's in the Gulf?)
Message-ID: <1991Jan23.044330.7990@cbnews.att.com>
Date: 23 Jan 91 04:43:30 GMT
References: <1991Jan19.040034.4025@cbnews.att.com>
Sender: military@cbnews.att.com (William B. Thacker)
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 9
Approved: military@att.att.com



From: cga66@ihlpy.att.com (Patrick V Kauffold)
Submarines are able to land special ops units on an enemy
shore.  

Are there no LURPs?  Are there no SAS?

Anyway, that's my speculation for the day.