Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!cbfsb!cbnewsc!cbnews!cbnews!military
From: jl3p+@andrew.cmu.edu (James Ting Lui)
Newsgroups: sci.military
Subject: Re: 50 Years Ago: Friday, 24 January, 1941
Message-ID: <1991Jan25.032831.11864@cbnews.att.com>
Date: 25 Jan 91 03:28:31 GMT
References: <1991Jan24.045358.27401@cbnews.att.com>
Sender: military@cbnews.att.com (William B. Thacker)
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 11
Approved: military@att.att.com



From: James Ting Lui <jl3p+@andrew.cmu.edu>
A Couple of Questions:

-Should the Dragon anti-tank missile, made by McDonnell Douglas, be
effective against Iraq's Soviet-made tanks.  What about TI's AAWS-M?

-How effective has the counterbattery artillery been?  I would think
that in todays hi-tech era, you could put the counterbattery on auto &
have a salvo launched before the enemy salvo landed.