Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!bu.edu!att!cbnews!cbnews!military
From: randy@ms.uky.edu (Randy Appleton)
Newsgroups: sci.military
Subject: Re: Desert Sheild Fact Book
Message-ID: <1991Jan12.010949.23154@cbnews.att.com>
Date: 12 Jan 91 01:09:49 GMT
References: <1991Jan8.004844.19724@cbnews.att.com>
Sender: military@cbnews.att.com (William B. Thacker)
Organization: University Of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences
Lines: 20
Approved: military@att.att.com



From: randy@ms.uky.edu (Randy Appleton)
zonker@ihlpf.att.com (Thomas M Harris) writes:

>From: zonker@ihlpf.att.com (Thomas M Harris)
>We also ran a bathtub* version of a U.S. desert sheild attack on Kuwait
>and then Iraq.  While U.S. loses were heavy, there was nothing in the Iraqi
>arsenal that could actually stop a U.S. attack.

Can you tell us more about this?  In your senerio, did the Turks, etc. 
actually intervene? How did the air force do?  Were the Saudi's useful?

-Thanks
-Randy
-- 
=============================================================================
My feelings on George Bush's promises:
	"You have just exceeded the gulibility threshold!"
============================================Randy@ms.uky.edu==================