Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!usc!apple!sun-barr!rutgers!aramis.rutgers.edu!athos.rutgers.edu!christian From: sacg1198@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Scott Cattanach) Newsgroups: soc.religion.christian Subject: Re: Why a New Testament? Message-ID: Date: 26 Jan 91 04:25:54 GMT Sender: hedrick@athos.rutgers.edu Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana Lines: 18 Approved: christian@aramis.rutgers.edu tensmekl@infonode.ingr.com (Kermit Tensmeyer) writes: > Is it your understanding that because "The Revelation of John" is > listed as the "last book" in the NT that it is the > "last book (chronologically)"? It is my understanding that several > of the episiles were written after revelation. I remember a lecture I said "stop at Revelation" because it was at the back of my Bible. I have heard claims that the Gospel According to John was written later. Fine, I wasn't making documentary claims, just stating by belief that our current NT is the close of the relevation from God that I mentioned earlier. -- -catt (Scott Cattanach - catt@uiuc.edu) Psalm 37:21 The wicked borroweth, and payeth not again: but the righteous sheweth mercy, and giveth. - King David on the relations between Washington and us taxpayers