Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!csn!ub!dsinc!casbah.acns.nwu.edu!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request From: merlyn@iwarp.intel.com (Randal L. Schwartz) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: 1 + 976 Telephone Programs Message-ID: <16555@accuvax.nwu.edu> Date: 30 Jan 91 16:00:18 GMT Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu Reply-To: "Randal L. Schwartz" Organization: Stonehenge; netaccess via Intel, Beaverton, Oregon, USA Lines: 19 Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 11, Issue 80, Message 5 of 10 In article <16527@accuvax.nwu.edu>, carols@world (Carol Springs) writes: | I don't know whether there is an interim period in which unadorned 976 | will still work, since I had 976 calls blocked on my lines long ago. | (I suspect dialing old-style will get you a "You must first dial 1..." | recording.) Any other areas have 1 + 976, or is New England Telephone | leading the way? We've *always* had 1+976, because around here, 1 means toll, and always has. (Well, maybe, not forever... sigh.) Just another person for whom the bell tolls, Randall L. Schwartz, Stonehenge Consulting Services (503)777-0095 on contract to Intel's iWarp project, Beaverton, Oregon, USA, Sol III merlyn@iwarp.intel.com ...!any-MX-mailer-like-uunet!iwarp.intel.com!merlyn