Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!lll-winken!uunet!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!pacbell.com!ucsd!ucbvax!pasteur!galileo.berkeley.edu!jbuck
From: jbuck@galileo.berkeley.edu (Joe Buck)
Newsgroups: comp.dsp
Subject: Re: Looking for a PD 56000 assembler
Keywords: GNU, gas, 56k, PD
Message-ID: <10761@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: 4 Feb 91 19:48:50 GMT
References: <1407@disuns2.epfl.ch> <1991Feb1.232018.11616@agate.berkeley.edu>
Sender: news@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: jbuck@galileo.berkeley.edu (Joe Buck)
Lines: 15

In article <1991Feb1.232018.11616@agate.berkeley.edu>, doug@eris.berkeley.edu (Doug Merritt) writes:
> I suspect that if the FSF took someone to court and tried to claim
> that the non-Gnu software belonged to the FSF simply because it
> was compiled with Gnu tools, then the court would very likely regard
> that as unfair restraint of trade, regardless of interpretation of
> fine print. That's just my personal opinion, of course.

Since it's also Richard Stallman's opinion that FSF has no more rights
to code compiled with gcc (or assembled with gas) than to text edited
by Emacs, you're clearly on safe ground.  However, if you link with
Gnu libraries it's another story.

--
Joe Buck
jbuck@galileo.berkeley.edu	 {uunet,ucbvax}!galileo.berkeley.edu!jbuck