Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!unix.cis.pitt.edu!pitt!willett!ForthNet
From: ForthNet@willett.pgh.pa.us (ForthNet articles from GEnie)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: What should the Standard include?
Message-ID: <2310.UUL1.3#5129@willett.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 6 Feb 91 03:25:10 GMT
Organization: (n.) to be organized.  But that's not important right now.
Lines: 21


 Date: 02-03-91 (09:45)              Number: 1028 of 1028 (Echo)
   To: GARY SMITH                    Refer#: 1024
 From: RAY DUNCAN                      Read: NO
 Subj: WHAT SHOULD THE STANDARD      Status: PUBLIC MESSAGE
 Conf: FORTH (58)                 Read Type: GENERAL (+)

    >SET-ORDER can be done portably in ANS FORTH

 Only if everyone implements *ALL* the extension word sets.  In our own
 case, I can definitely promise you that LMI will *NOT* implement the
 extension words that it considers brain-damaged, which definitely
 includes ALSO and ONLY.

 NET/Mail : LMI Forth Board, Los Angeles, CA (213) 306-3530
 <<<>>>
-----
This message came from GEnie via willett.  You cannot Reply to the author
using email.  Please post a follow-up article, or use any instructions
the author may have included (USMail addresses, telephone #, whatever).
Report problems to: dwp@willett.pgh.pa.us or uunet!willett!dwp