Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!think.com!spool.mu.edu!uunet!infonode!fordke
From: fordke@infonode.ingr.com (Keith Ford x8614)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Re: Software to go from Fidonet to Usenet, and vice versa
Message-ID: <1991Jan31.210313.12048@infonode.ingr.com>
Date: 31 Jan 91 21:03:13 GMT
References: <2336.27A61D0B@ofa123.fidonet.org> <59485@aurs01.UUCP>
Organization: Intergraph Corp. Huntsville, AL
Lines: 15

In article <59485@aurs01.UUCP> roberson@aurxc2.UUCP (Charles "Chip" Roberson) writes:
>Conclusion:  unless one has a relatively specific configuration, a good
>knowledge of USENET, and a lot of patience, UFGATE is not a good choice.

UFgate worked fine for me.  I was able to get it up in one night with my
Opus CBCS board.  A good knowledge of Usenet is useful, but if one is
going to get involved with Usenet, he should be prepared.  I'll be glad
to help anyone with UFgate via email.  Mind you, I run no mailer other
than what is built in to Opus.


-- 
| ...!uunet!ingr!fordke    OR    fordke@ingr.com
| Micro Magic BBS     (Fidonet: 1:373/12,   MaBell: +1 205 830 2362)
| "and the Trees are all kept equal by hatchet, axe, and saw." -Rush