Xref: utzoo comp.org.eff.talk:1304 news.misc:5952 Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!menudo.uh.edu!lobster!moxie!sugar!ficc!peter From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk,news.misc Subject: Re: Caller ID: Is comp.dcom.telecom biased? Message-ID: Date: 30 Jan 91 14:23:49 GMT References: <15377@milton.u.washington.edu> <1991Jan30.000852.10527@lavaca.uh.edu> Reply-To: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) Organization: Xenix Support, FICC Lines: 22 In article <1991Jan30.000852.10527@lavaca.uh.edu> jet@karazm.math.uh.edu ("J. Eric Townsend") writes: > Yes, he certainly is. Luckily, it's to the point where it's painfully > obvious that he's strongly biased. > >But what to do about this? >0., 1., 2. 3. Since his bias is honest and open, simply keep it in mind and put up with it. There is an alt.dcom.telecom for equal time for the folks who really really want it. Personally, I have less problem with Pat than some other moderators who seem awfully quick to reject articles on the grounds that they perceieve them to be largely repeating other messages that they have recieved (but not yet posted) on the subject. 4. Comp.dcom.telecom could be removed, and the TELECOM digest could remain purely as a mailing list. -- Peter da Silva. `-_-' peter@ferranti.com +1 713 274 5180. 'U` "Have you hugged your wolf today?"