Path: utzoo!utgpu!cunews!bnrgate!brtph3!brchh104!brchh165!gstovall
From: gstovall@brchh165.BNR.CA (Greg Stovall)
Newsgroups: comp.os.mach
Subject: Re: Mach 3.0 info request
Message-ID: <1452@brchh104.bnr.ca>
Date: 30 Jan 91 12:55:59 GMT
References: <2305@sirius.ucs.adelaide.edu.au> <1991Jan30.084253.14635@hemel.bull.co.uk>
Sender: news@brchh104.bnr.ca
Reply-To: gstovall@brchh165.BNR.CA (Greg Stovall)
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd.
Lines: 23

In article <1991Jan30.084253.14635@hemel.bull.co.uk>,
ewoods@hemel.bull.co.uk (Eoin Woods) writes:
|>I think all of the "official" MACH information is held for anonymous FTP
|>at wb1.cs.cmu.edu (128.2.250.16) with login "anonymous" in the /usr/mach/
|>area.
|>
|>Eoin
|>--
|>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|>~    Eoin Woods, Software Development Group, Bull HN Information Systems,   ~
|>~                Maxted Road, Hemel Hempstead, Herts HP2 7DZ, UK.           ~
|>~                Tel : +44 442 232222 x4823   Fax : +44 442 234084          ~
|>~      < Eoin.Woods@hemel.bull.co.uk  or   ...!uunet!ukc!brno!ewoods>       ~
|>~          < When do we start news group comp.os.emacs ?  :-) >             ~
               
When I anonymous ftp to wb1.cs.cmu.edu, restrictions are placed such
that I cannot cd to the /usr/mach area (It won't allow any absolute paths to
be specified).  Does anyone know whether anonymous ftp is still a valid way to
acquire MACH information?     

Gregory T. Stovall                gstovall@bnr.ca
Bell-Northern Research            ESN   446-7009
Richardson, Texas, USA            (214) 907-7009