Xref: utzoo comp.os.msdos.apps:940 comp.os.msdos.programmer:3133
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!gatech!uflorida!reef.cis.ufl.edu!jdb
From: jdb@reef.cis.ufl.edu (Brian K. W. Hook)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps,comp.os.msdos.programmer
Subject: QRAM VS. QEMM
Message-ID: <26662@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU>
Date: 4 Feb 91 13:36:11 GMT
References: <26661@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU>
Sender: news@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU
Distribution: usa
Organization: UF CIS Dept.
Lines: 13


I am using a 386 and QEMM386.  However, since I am running into conflicts
with other protected mode programs, I was wondering whether or not it would
be better if I switched to QRAM.  

What benefits does QEMM have that QRAM doesn't?  All I am doing is loading
my device drivers high.  I don't configure any EMS except for specific 
applications and then I boot off of a special boot floppy to configure
all my memory as EMS.

Thanks,

Brian