Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!lll-winken!uunet!samsung!emory!gatech!udel!sbcs!csws12.ic.sunysb.edu!cfreas From: cfreas@csws12.ic.sunysb.edu (Terry Freas) Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc Subject: Re: Is OS/2 dead? Message-ID: <1991Jan31.231237.22301@sbcs.sunysb.edu> Date: 31 Jan 91 23:12:37 GMT References: <4993@lure.latrobe.edu.au> <1991Jan30.065454.11451@unixg.ubc.ca> Sender: usenet@sbcs.sunysb.edu (Usenet poster) Organization: State University of New York at Stony Brook Lines: 23 In article <1991Jan30.065454.11451@unixg.ubc.ca> ballard@cheddar.ucs.ubc.ca (Alan Ballard) writes: >In article <4993@lure.latrobe.edu.au> CCMK@lure.latrobe.edu.au (Mark Kosten - Computer Centre, La Trobe Uni.) writes: >>eric@snark.thyrsus.com (Eric S. Raymond) writes: >> >>Does anyone, particularly from Microsoft and IBM, have any comments, or is >>is this a confusion of the original report from last year? >> > >The following is the word from Microsoft about this, as issued on Compuserve. >I haven't yet heard much about the press briefing mentioned... other than >some comments that it repeated statement from last fall. > >[press release on Compuserve (MS Forum) deleted] >[...] it to run Windows applications."Microsoft will outline plans for OS/2 >and Windows at a press seminar held at Microsoft on Tuesday. will and held in the same sentence? Did this occur already or not? Either way, can someone post a summary? I'm very interested in Gatesian philosophy at this point... -- Jeremy Wohl / wohl@max.physics.sunysb.edu / cfreas@csserv1.ic.sunysb.edu