Xref: utzoo comp.sources.bugs:2828 comp.mail.uucp:5815
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!emory!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!mcs.kent.edu!neoucom.edu!redpoll!red
From: red@redpoll.neoucom.edu (Richard E. Depew)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.bugs,comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Re: smail-2.5 fix for domain gateway routing
Summary: It works without a "fix".
Keywords: Patchlevel?
Message-ID: <1991Feb1.024031.1859@redpoll.neoucom.edu>
Date: 1 Feb 91 02:40:31 GMT
References: <1991Jan23.061830.19719@watdragon.waterloo.edu> <1991Jan24.034941.3360@Sandelman.OCUnix.On.Ca> <1991Jan30.195213.12815@eci386.uucp>
Organization: Home, Munroe Falls, Ohio
Lines: 23


     This discussion seems to have come full circle.

     Unless I've misunderstood, Smail 2.5 handles domains correctly, at
least at patchlevel 3.

     A paths file entry of:
.site.domain	gateway!%s
fed an address of user@foo.site.domain results in a path of:
gateway!foo.site.domain!user

    Isn't that what it is supposed to do?

    Could it be that the "problem" was already fixed in the first
three patches?  A "patched" kit is available by anonymous ftp from
tut.cis.ohio-state.edu.  The "smart-host" function also works in this
version, unlike the patchlevel 0 version archived at many places.

Dick Depew
-- 
Richard E. Depew                     uunet!aablue!{redpoll,neoucom}!red
Village of Munroe Falls, OH.         red@redpoll.neoucom.edu (home)
NEOUCOM, Rootstown, OH.              red@uhura.neoucom.edu (work)