Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!uupsi!sunic!ugle.unit.no!nuug!ifi!enag
From: enag@ifi.uio.no (Erik Naggum)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: typedefing functions (Re: Is typedef char BUFFER[20] legal?)
Message-ID: <ENAG.91Feb5022846@holmenkollen.ifi.uio.no>
Date: 5 Feb 91 01:28:56 GMT
References: <1212@tredysvr.Tredydev.Unisys.COM> <1991Jan29.210100.8105@zoo.toronto.edu>
	<22642@netcom.UUCP> <1991Feb3.000128.15980@zoo.toronto.edu>
	<1991Feb4.053613.3758@watmath.waterloo.edu>
	<ENAG.91Feb4192806@holmenkollen.ifi.uio.no>
Sender: enag@ifi.uio.no (Erik Naggum)
Followup-To: comp.std.c
Organization: Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway
Lines: 12
In-Reply-To: enag@ifi.uio.no's message of Mon, 4 Feb 91 18:28:19 GMT

In article <ENAG.91Feb4192806@holmenkollen.ifi.uio.no>, Erik Naggum writes:

> The functions would be declared
> 
> 	f foo
> 	{ ... }

I have been informed that this is entirely bogus.

--
[Erik Naggum]					     <enag@ifi.uio.no>
Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway			   <erik@naggum.uu.no>