Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!maverick.ksu.ksu.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!uxa.cso.uiuc.edu!ragg0270 From: ragg0270@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Richard Alan Gerber) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Subject: Re: How to improve Workbench 2.0! Message-ID: <1991Feb2.184118.3880@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> Date: 2 Feb 91 18:41:18 GMT References: <1991Jan27.105252.7019@marlin.jcu.edu.au> <7662@sugar.hackercorp.com> <56933@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU> <1991Jan30.193443.5821@convex.com> <16243@sdcc6.ucsd.edu> Sender: news@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (News) Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana Lines: 31 A lot of people have debated the pros and cons of the Mac vs. Amiga trashcans. It's seems that is confusion about what does what. Here are a few of my observations, although I am certainly not a Mac expert. (1) Each Amiga disk can have a trashcan. Dragging something to the trashcan simply moves that file to the trashcan directory. There is sits until you click on the trash icon and choose "Empty Trash" from a workbench menu, at which point it is deleted from disk. Nice, clean, simple to understand. (2) The Mac trashcan sits on the desktop. From my observations, what must happen is something like this: When you drag a file to the Mac trashcan, the operating system somehow marks this file as having been put in the trash. It stays in that state until you chose "Empty Trash" from the desktop menu. But it's not quite that simple. Do you even notice how the trash gets emptied without your telling it to do so? Anytime there is disk activity on that disk, the trash gets emptied. Eject the disk. The trash is emptied. Write to the disk. The trash gets emptied. Bottom line: Put something in the Mac trashcan, you'll likely never get it back. Personally, I prefer the Amiga method. If I put it in the trashcan, I can get it out if I later change my mind. If I want to get rid of it for sure in the first place, I'll just choose discard from the workbench menu. Just my $.02 worth, Regard, Richard gerber@rigel.astro.uiuc.edu .