Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!spool.mu.edu!samsung!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!menudo.uh.edu!nuchat!sugar!peter From: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Subject: Re: How to improve Workbench 2.0! Message-ID: <7704@sugar.hackercorp.com> Date: 4 Feb 91 17:17:45 GMT References: <7666@sugar.hackercorp.com> <812@cbmger.UUCP> <1991Feb3.101342.8383@news.iastate.edu> Organization: Sugar Land Unix -- Houston, TX Lines: 11 In article <1991Feb3.101342.8383@news.iastate.edu> skank@iastate.edu (Skank George L) writes: > I'm not sure if this is needed, but how 'bout a REXX bit in the file > system, like the pure bit except for REXX programs... Better would be a method of including a comment with the file to describe what interpreter to use. It can't be in the file itself because, unlike UNIX, it's too late to standardize comment conventions. How about putting it in the filenote? -- Peter da Silva. `-_-' .