Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!lethe!yunexus!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!apple!well!farren From: farren@well.sf.ca.us (Mike Farren) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc Subject: Re: How do we change the scheduler? (Was Re: Multitasking at home...) Message-ID: <22863@well.sf.ca.us> Date: 24 Jan 91 10:02:57 GMT References: <1991Jan18.062608.14969@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> <22782@well.sf.ca.us> <1991Jan21.181804.1232@cs.umu.se> <1991Jan22.033011.21457@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> Lines: 47 mykes@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG (Mike Schwartz) writes: >To program the hardware, you only need to learn 10 pages in the hardware >manual. To program under the operating system, it takes years of experience >and a bunch of banging your head against the wall figuring out why the examples >in the thousands of pages of OS manuals don't work when you type them in. Well, that's a good argument for using examples from the net, or examples from the new RKMs. Yes, many of the old examples did not work. That is not the case any longer. >Then there is the story that Richard Hicks, one of developers of Artic Fox >for Electronic Arts told me. He said that they never could figure out where >all the CPU time was going on the machine. It turns out that if they killed >multitasking, their code would have run at least 2 times faster. These are >words from his mouth. In my experience, those words are the words of inexperience or ignorance. It isn't that hard to make things go fast on this system. >I don't like to cut anything from the design of the game, >especially for the sake of the operating system which does NOTHING for the >game. So who says you have to? You make comparisons with Mac games, which BY THEIR VERY NATURE do not reside in a 512K system. Resource forks, remember? Stuff kept on disk until it's needed, and loaded as required. Seems to work pretty well there - and works pretty well the times I've tried it. If you don't want to use the OS, don't. I don't care, the OS doesn't care. All I'm asking is that you don't trash it for all the other applications unless you absolutely have to - and I STILL haven't seen any convincing example of having to. >However, I do think that many normally honest people will pirate software >if all they have to do is make a diskcopy using standard OS tools. Perhaps. I still haven't seen any hard evidence that this is a significant factor in low sales, though. >Insulting me goes a long way toward making me change my mind! Awesome debating >tactic dude! Yeah, radical, wasn't it :-) -- Mike Farren farren@well.sf.ca.us