Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!lethe!yunexus!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!decwrl!pa.dec.com!decuac!hadron!lsw!gjc
From: gjc@lsw.UUCP (Greg)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
Subject: Re: True Multitasking
Summary: Bugs, bugs, where for art thou bugs?
Message-ID: <186@lsw.UUCP>
Date: 4 Feb 91 08:18:55 GMT
References: <42598@nigel.ee.udel.edu> <678@tnc.UUCP> <MWM.91Jan30173903@raven.pa.dec.com>
Organization: LSW, Landover MD
Lines: 21

In article <MWM.91Jan30173903@raven.pa.dec.com>, mwm@pa.dec.com (Mike (My Watch Has Windows) Meyer) writes:
> That's one reasonable definition of "real" computers - that the system
> crashing is considered to a system problem, and not an application
> problem.
> 
> 	<mike

Excuse me??   How can a programmer, who is human, possibly account for
all possible contingencies???          

Does this mean that every time an application crashes your Amiga/Mac
that the system designers are at fault just because some funky programmer
who doesn't know what he's doing wrote some strange out-of-this world
program??

Or better yet!! are Are you trying to say that the Amiga is not a "real"
computer???

Inquiring minds want to know!! :)

Gregory John Casamento (The Borgster!!)