Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!cbmvax!peter
From: peter@cbmvax.commodore.com (Peter Cherna)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Re: GadTools functionality
Message-ID: <18434@cbmvax.commodore.com>
Date: 1 Feb 91 16:40:38 GMT
References: <91023.105132GHGAQA4@cc1.kuleuven.ac.be> <MWM.91Jan23105444@raven.pa.dec.com> <18096@cbmvax.commodore.com> <MWM.91Jan28112420@raven.pa.dec.com> <18205@cbmvax.commodore.com> <MWM.91Jan28170750@raven.pa.dec.com> <18249@cbmvax.commodore.com> <MWM
 <18312@ <M
Reply-To: peter@cbmvax.commodore.com (Peter Cherna)
Organization: Commodore, West Chester, PA
Lines: 30

In article <MWM.91Jan31143357@raven.pa.dec.com> mwm@pa.dec.com (Mike (My Watch Has Windows) Meyer) writes:
>In article <18376@cbmvax.commodore.com> peter@cbmvax.commodore.com (Peter Cherna) writes:

>In other words, "we're working on it."

Yes, based on your definition, we are.

>   No, you should have not made any inferences based on the absence of
>   reserved tags for the functionality you crave.
>
>Actually, the inference wasn't based on the absence of flags or tags.
>The inference was based on the response "that functionality is
>insufficient" (aka "You don't want that") when I asked about them
>being missing.

Here are your original words that raised this comment:

	Once again - no indication of future plans, and I don't
	recall seeing a flag (even tagged as unimplemented).  Last
	time around, I didn't press the matter.  Ditto for some
	facility to move the gadgets after they've been created.

>	<mike

     Peter
--
     Peter Cherna, Software Engineer, Commodore-Amiga, Inc.
     {uunet|rutgers}!cbmvax!peter    peter@cbmvax.commodore.com
My opinions do not necessarily represent the opinions of my employer.
"Oh, PIN-compatible!  I thought you wanted me to make it IN-compatible!"