Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!gatech!uflorida!rex!samsung!usc!apple!netcom!seitz
From: seitz@netcom.UUCP (Matthew Seitz)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: TT disk, memory upgrades (was Re: TT sales)
Message-ID: <22475@netcom.UUCP>
Date: 1 Feb 91 03:54:03 GMT
References: <2815@atari.UUCP> <38650@cup.portal.com> <2818@atari.UUCP>
Distribution: usa
Organization: Netcom- The Bay Area's Public Access Unix System {408 241-9760 guest}
Lines: 17

In article <2818@atari.UUCP> apratt@atari.UUCP (Allan Pratt) writes:
>
>Bob_BobR_Retelle wrote a message pretty much pissing in my coffee, NOT
>contributing anything useful to the discussion or giving any thought to
>what I was saying.
>

Bob was a little harsh (as usual), but he does raise a valid point.  Why
did Atari require a daughterboard?  I'm sensitive to this having just paid
$275 to upgrade my ST from 1Mb to 2Mb.  Of this, only $50 was for the
extra RAM.  $175 was for a daughterboard (including installation) and
$50 to replace the 1Mb of RAM that had to be deactivated on the motherboard.
Why do I have to play the daughterboard game again with the TT?
-- 
					Matthew Seitz
					seitz@netcom.UUCP
					netcom!seitz