Xref: utzoo comp.sys.3b1:57 comp.sys.att:11667
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!news.cs.indiana.edu!msi.umn.edu!cs.umn.edu!sialis!quad!dts
From: dts@quad.sialis.com (David Sandberg)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.3b1,u3b.misc,comp.sys.att
Subject: Re: "comp.sys.3b2" and "comp.sources.3b2" anyone?
Keywords: time to move the process elsewhere?
Message-ID: <655@quad.sialis.com>
Date: 1 Feb 91 06:07:54 GMT
References: <1991Jan29.125635.8145@unhtel.uucp> <653@quad.sialis.com> <1991Jan31.195359.4344@mtek.com>
Distribution: na
Organization: Quadric Systems, Burnsville MN
Lines: 23

In article <1991Jan31.195359.4344@mtek.com> bbh@mtek.com (Bud Hovell @ Mtek) writes:
:In article <653@quad.sialis.com> dts@quad.sialis.com (David Sandberg) writes:
:<Hmm.  Isn't it interesting that the first sustained topic to appear in
:<comp.sys.3b1 is about every AT&T machine _but_ the 3b1?
:
:Well, the articles, you will notice, are being cross-posted. The original
:article that launched this discussion was *specifically* directed to the
:topic of whether it would make any sense to move u3b.* to comp.*.3b2.

I knew the articles were crossposted.  My comment was only half-serious.
However, I felt the use of a smiley would negate the subtle point I did
want to make in the midst of the irony, so I left it out.

:Perhaps we should *not* cross-post this discussion to comp.sys.3b1, since
:those persons interested will most-probably be reading comp.sys.att anyway,
:even if they cannot get u3b.*

Now this I can agree with wholeheartedly.

-- 
 \\         David Sandberg         \     ,=,       ,=,           \\
 //      dts@quad.sialis.com       /     | |uadric `=,ystems     //
 \\  uunet!umn-cs!sialis!quad!dts  \     `=\       `='           \\