Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!lll-winken!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!uw-beaver!milton!sumax!ole!thebes!amc-gw!intek01.UUCP!mark
From: mark@intek01.uucp (Mark McWiggins)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
Subject: Lies, damned lies, and benchmarks: RS6000 v. SS-1+
Message-ID: <1991Jan30.003004.74@intek01.uucp>
Date: 30 Jan 91 00:30:04 GMT
Organization: Integration Technologies, Inc. (Intek)
Lines: 12

The most recent version of Unix Review contains a rather flamish
letter from someone who claims that his RS6000's don't perform
appreciably better in the application they're running than do 
SparcStation 1+'s, and are much harder to port software to, as well.

Any comments on this from RS6000 users?  Thanks in advance.

-- 
Mark McWiggins			Integration Technologies, Inc. (Intek)
+1 206 455 9935			DISCLAIMER:  I could be wrong ...
1400 112th Ave SE #202		Bellevue WA  98004
mark@intek.com    		Ask me about C++!