Xref: utzoo comp.sources.d:6410 comp.windows.x:32126
Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!apple!limbo!taylor
From: taylor@limbo.Intuitive.Com (Dave Taylor)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.d,comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: rms says...
Message-ID: <1695@limbo.Intuitive.Com>
Date: 31 Jan 91 18:38:26 GMT
References: <21327@yunexus.YorkU.CA> <4607@lib.tmc.edu> <27A6E9BA.2E94@tct.uucp>
Reply-To: taylor@limbo.Intuitive.Com (Dave Taylor)
Followup-To: comp.sources.d
Organization: Intuitive Systems, Mountain View, CA: +1 (415) 966-1151
Lines: 20

Chip Salzenberg writes:

> Our rights to control our own programming are explicitly protected in
> the few cases that really matter to me: output of GCC/G++ and files
> edited by Emacs.

Files edited by EMACS?

You've GOT to be kidding here, Chip.

Tell me you aren't saying that any files edited by EMACS now have
the FSF license stuck to them forever?

If so, what an incredibly powerful argument to use "vi"...

						-- Dave Taylor
Intuitive Systems
Mountain View, California

taylor@limbo.intuitive.com    or   {uunet!}{decwrl,apple}!limbo!taylor