Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!yale!bunker!hcap!hnews!163!113!Chris.Brown
From: Chris.Brown@f113.n163.z1.fidonet.org (Chris Brown)
Newsgroups: misc.handicap
Subject: Re: 60 min on Mercury amalgam fillings
Message-ID: <17355@bunker.UUCP>
Date: 1 Feb 91 02:54:50 GMT
Sender: wtm@bunker.UUCP
Reply-To: Chris.Brown@f113.n163.z1.fidonet.org
Distribution: misc
Organization: FidoNet node 1:163/113
Lines: 15
Approved: wtm@bunker.UUCP

Index Number: 13340

Im not sure why a nuro should be the one to investigate sensitivities. 
Could you explain this?   As I mentioned, I do not know of a test for 
mercury senstivity that is reliable.  That is why I feel consumers should 
be advised of the possibility, and allowed to make up their own minds. 
If the doctor or dentist involved is threatened by the consumer being 
thusly empowered, he or she should be relieved of his/her involvement, 
and sent on a course in basic business practice and professional ethics. 
There is only one way I know of of determining if mercury is causing a 
systemic problem: remove the mercury and see if there is an improvement. 

--
Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!163!113!Chris.Brown
Internet: Chris.Brown@f113.n163.z1.fidonet.org