Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!bunker!hcap!hnews!101!165!Isaac.Obie
From: Isaac.Obie@f165.n101.z1.fidonet.org (Isaac Obie)
Newsgroups: misc.handicap
Subject: Re: ARKENSTONE VERSUS PCKPR
Message-ID: <17389@bunker.UUCP>
Date: 4 Feb 91 14:05:07 GMT
Sender: wtm@bunker.UUCP
Reply-To: Isaac.Obie@f165.n101.z1.fidonet.org
Distribution: misc
Organization: FidoNet node 1:101/165 - Starbase: Boston, Boston MA
Lines: 15
Approved: wtm@bunker.UUCP

Index Number: 13372

[This is from the Blink Talk Conference]

don, i think i've been a bit harsh about the arkenstone. i guess my major
disappointment is that it cannot scan the want ad very well. the other thing
is that i get contract work in large print and must have someone use truscan
to clean it up. it actually works pretty well considering. i guess i don't
have much patience with it. it seems to take twenty to thirty seconds on a
page. i wish it was more like five or six seconds. oh, well, maybe that will
come. what kind of pc are you using with the arkenstone? thanks.

--
Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!101!165!Isaac.Obie
Internet: Isaac.Obie@f165.n101.z1.fidonet.org