Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!bunker!hcap!hnews!101!460!Donald.Breda
From: Donald.Breda@f460.n101.z1.fidonet.org (Donald Breda)
Newsgroups: misc.handicap
Subject: Re: infallible scanning
Message-ID: <17501@bunker.UUCP>
Date: 4 Feb 91 16:25:54 GMT
Sender: wtm@bunker.UUCP
Reply-To: Donald.Breda@f460.n101.z1.fidonet.org
Distribution: misc
Organization: FidoNet node 1:101/460 - VI/BUG, Holbrook MA
Lines: 20
Approved: wtm@bunker.UUCP

Index Number: 13380

[This is from the Blink Talk Conference]

Hi Henry; I am not going to quote your msg because of its length.
You said that you tried documents on the Arkenstone and it failed.
Then you said you tried them on an oscar and it did wonderfully.
You said that the arkenstone dealer said he had it set up improperly.
Well I think he was telling you the truth.I have used both products and
can safely say that whatever one reads the other will.
The oscar is the arkenstone with a different front end interface. If
there was that much differents between them then you can bet there was a
poblem with the arkenstone.
I do not say this to defend one over the other just to put things right.

... Abled, Blinktalk and sSilver xpress in Boston 9600 HST

--
Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!101!460!Donald.Breda
Internet: Donald.Breda@f460.n101.z1.fidonet.org