Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!kddlab!titcca!cc.titech.ac.jp!necom830!mohta From: mohta@necom830.cc.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Sun bogosities, including MMU thrashing Message-ID: <7191@titcce.cc.titech.ac.jp> Date: 7 Feb 91 02:40:39 GMT References: <5257@auspex.auspex.com> <3956@skye.ed.ac.uk> <399@appserv.Eng.Sun.COM> <417@appserv.Eng.Sun.COM> Sender: news@cc.titech.ac.jp Organization: Tokyo Institute of Technology Lines: 30 In article <417@appserv.Eng.Sun.COM> lm@slovax.Eng.Sun.COM (Larry McVoy) writes: >Subject: Re: FLAME ON: Re: Sun bogosities, including MMU thrashing >Ready flame throwers, take aim, .... fire! Would you stop posting such things unless you want to be the living evidence of Sun bogosity? >Since I kept the read ahead alg, I'm now >doing a 111KB of useless read by your definition. (You seem to be assuming >that 1KB is some nifty magic size.) Everyone will admit it work very well 80% of time. >>Let me guess: a large, large percentage of your 4KB-8KB buffers or pages >>that are used for IO contain files or directories whose median size is >>well under twice that of a page, and a fairly large percentage contain >>files that are smaller than half a page. >A little worse, but notice that lack of a knee at 1KB. No one claimed there is a knee at 1KB. Masataka Ohta PS I prefere a good (or even bad) armchair architect much better than a bad architect developping some real product.