Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!ibmchs!auschs!d75!excelsior!woan
From: woan@excelsior (Ronald S Woan)
Newsgroups: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d
Subject: Re: Sound Blaster vs. Ad Lib
Keywords: SB is Adlib compatible
Message-ID: <3385@d75.UUCP>
Date: 13 Jan 91 13:33:14 GMT
References: <1991Jan4.132831.21763@mailer.cc.fsu.edu> <660@ub.d.umn.edu>
Sender: news@d75.UUCP
Reply-To: woan@peyote.cactus.org
Organization: Austin School of Hardknocks
Lines: 16


In article <660@ub.d.umn.edu>, sbrown@ub.d.umn.edu (scott brown) writes:
scott> I have heard a lot about these two cards and have pretty much
scott> come to the conclusion to buy a SB.  Does it have a way to
scott> program sound like the Ad lib?  If not, I might still get the
scott> Ad lib board.

The soundblaster is for all intensive purposes 100% Adlib compatible.
It just has the added functionality of a DAC, game port, digitizer,
available MIDI connection, and (optional on newer model) 12 voice game
blaster compatibility.

+-----All Views Expressed Are My Own And Are Not Necessarily Shared By------+
+------------------------------My Employer----------------------------------+
+ Ronald S. Woan       woan@peyote.cactus.org or woan%austin@iinus1.ibm.com +
+ other email addresses             Prodigy: XTCR74A Compuserve: 73530,2537 +