Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!cs.utexas.edu!yale!mintaka!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!mcsun!hp4nl!dnlunx!freyr!fictorie From: fictorie@freyr.pttrnl.nl (Henk Fictorie) Newsgroups: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d Subject: Re: Trouble with Telix Kermit Keywords: n Message-ID: Date: 14 Jan 91 09:05:41 GMT References: <3129@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> <27977.2790e52f@nt.sait.edu.au> <1991Jan13.211741.6620@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <1991Jan13.222953.24375@agate.berkeley.edu> Sender: news@dnlunx.pttrnl.nl Lines: 24 ilan343@violet.berkeley.edu (Geraldo Veiga) writes: >In article <1991Jan13.211741.6620@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> dmm0t@holmes.acc.Virginia.EDU (Dave Meyer) writes: >> >>My suggestion: use a better kermit program. I'm using the >> >How does this compare to other protocols like Ymodem an Zmodem? >I've recently switched from (old) kermit to zmodem for all my >micro-mainframe transfers. It speeded up things by a factor of (at >least) 2. The rzsz package (ftp'able from simtel20) compiled without >changes in every Unix machine I tried. Combine this with Telix (under >DOS) or pcomm (under unix) and you are in business. I tried rzsz with Telix and with DSZ and I only got timeouts after one exchanged packet. I did try several sizes for the window and/or packet size in rzsz, but it wasn't of any help. Also different settings for the flow control didn't help. Anybody got any suggestions?? -- Henk Fictorie, PTT Research Neher Labs, H_Fictorie@pttrnl.nl P.O. box 421, ...!hp4nl!dnlunx!henkf 2260 AK Leidschendam, The Netherlands Phone : +31 70 3326356