Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!umich!dgsi!dbc
From: dbc@cimage.com (David Caswell)
Newsgroups: comp.databases
Subject: Re: how bad is oracle?
Message-ID: <1991Feb6.181906.17145@cimage.com>
Date: 6 Feb 91 18:19:06 GMT
References: <10737@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> <1991Feb3.182558.14411@oracle.com>
Reply-To: dbc@dgsi.UUCP (David Caswell)
Organization: Cimage Corp, Ann Arbor, MI
Lines: 13

.In article <1991Feb3.182558.14411@oracle.com> jklein@oracle.UUCP (Jonathan Klein) writes:
.>In article <10737@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> mao@eden.Berkeley.EDU (Mike Olson) writes:
.>>here's the question:  i have heard that oracle does not have a query
.>>optimizer.  i find this surprising.  is it true?
.>>
.>
.>All versions of oracle that I have worked with have had an query optimizer.
.>
.>Jonathan Klein
.>Oracle Corporation
.

How bad is Oracle -- Not nearly as bad as Unify.