Xref: utzoo comp.sys.att:11733 comp.dcom.modems:8237
Path: utzoo!attcan!telly!lethe!yunexus!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!att!fang!ebd
From: ebd@fang.ATT.COM (Elliot B Dierksen)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.att,u3b.tech,comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: 3B2 vs. Telebit
Summary: more info
Message-ID: <1991Feb5.220516.29469@fang.ATT.COM>
Date: 5 Feb 91 22:05:16 GMT
References: <1991Jan31.220647.20647@fang.ATT.COM>
Organization: AT&T Tax Systems Development, Maitland FL
Lines: 23

In article <1991Jan31.220647.20647@fang.ATT.COM>, ebd@fang.ATT.COM (Elliot B Dierksen) writes:
> I just recently aquired a TB+ for my 3B2 and I was looking for suggestions on
> the best way to handle the flow control. I tried using CTS/RTS and the 3B2
> never saw anything from the modem. It's running currently with no flow
> control, but I think my throughput isn't as good as it could be. Any
> suggestions welcomed. I checked the Telebit info from uunet, but not mention
> of 3B2's....   :-(

A little more info. 3B2/400 running R3.2. Modem is on an HPORTS (4 serial, 1
parallel) port. I have access to an EPORTS (8 serial) card if that will help.
Modem is a Trailblazer+, 3.0 ROMS (Yes 3.0!!!).

kevin@cfctech:  I tried to respond to your mail, but it hasn't gotten
through.

Thanks,

EBD
-- 
Elliot Dierksen        "It's such a fine line between clever and stupid."
                        --  "This is Spinal Tap"
Work) ebd@fang.att.com                                (407) 660-3377
Home) elliot@alfred.UUCP                              (407) 290-9744