Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!casbah.acns.nwu.edu!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: covert@covert.enet.dec.com (John R. Covert  05-Feb-1991 1125)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Forts Meade and Ritchie in Maryland
Message-ID: <16712@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Date: 5 Feb 91 15:42:00 GMT
Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu
Organization: TELECOM Digest
Lines: 19
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 11, Issue 95, Message 6 of 9


  From: Dale Neiburg
  Organization: National Public Radio
  Subject: Re: Forts Meade and Ritchie in Maryland
 
On 4 Feb., Carl Moore wrote:
 
>  As far as I know (not having been to Fort Meade),
>the other phones on that post are in the Odenton exchange, which is
>going into 410 (causing a problem as to how to list the area code for
>zip code 20755?).
 
I live about ten miles from Fort Meade, and about thirty *YARDS* from
the new 301/410 dividing line.  In fact, I live on the 410 side of the
line, but my CO is on the 301 side, so I'm keeping the old, unimproved
301.

As I understand it, my Zip Code (20723) will end up being divvied up
between 301 and 410 also.