Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!hybrid!scifi!bywater!uunet!convex!usenet From: tchrist@convex.COM (Tom Christiansen) Newsgroups: comp.editors Subject: Re: comp.editors.vi Message-ID: <1991Feb01.204935.7996@convex.com> Date: 1 Feb 91 20:49:35 GMT References: <1991Jan31.140256.1523@convex.com> <1123@borg.cs.unc.edu> <1991Feb1.172312.1921@arrayb.uucp> Sender: usenet@convex.com (news access account) Reply-To: tchrist@convex.COM (Tom Christiansen) Organization: CONVEX Software Development, Richardson, TX Lines: 28 Nntp-Posting-Host: pixel.convex.com From the keyboard of wicklund@arrayb.uucp (Tom Wicklund): :In article <1991Jan31.140256.1523@convex.com>, tchrist@convex.COM (Tom :Christiansen) writes: :|> From the keyboard of abed@venus.wustl.edu (Abed M. Hammoud): :|> : I Also like to see a separate newsgroup for VI. :|> :|> How come? Is there something not being discussed in this group that :|> would get discussed more by having the vi stuff elsewhere? :Since 80% of the discussion in this group is about vi, there's :obviously a need for a vi newsgroup. I'm sure I miss a lot of :discussion here since I have to try to find the non-vi discussion. :I would prefer a separate comp.editors.vi so that this group could :remain for discussion of editors other than vi and emacs. Ok, let's rename comp.emacs to comp.editors.emacs, create comp.editors.vi, pipe gnu.emacs.* into comp.editors.emacs, and rename comp.editors to comp.editor.neither-vi-nor-emacs. Really, a killfile line should take care of the vi talk for those of you that don't care for it. It's not as though because of vi talk there can't be other stuff here. --tom -- "Hey, did you hear Stallman has replaced /vmunix with /vmunix.el? Now he can finally have the whole O/S built-in to his editor like he always wanted!" --me (Tom Christiansen )