Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cmcl2!adm!smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: stdarg
Message-ID: <15108@smoke.brl.mil>
Date: 6 Feb 91 19:53:07 GMT
References: <1991Feb5.145001.26837@hounix.uucp> <588@taumet.com> <1991Feb6.171144.7182@Neon.Stanford.EDU>
Organization: U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, APG, MD.
Lines: 9

In article <1991Feb6.171144.7182@Neon.Stanford.EDU> dkeisen@Gang-of-Four.Stanford.EDU (Dave Eisen) writes:
>Probably a reasonable decision. But it does make it a pain to deal
>with the third party software we use that is full of <varargs.h> functions
>that can take 0 or more arguments.

Since the linkage for <stdarg.h> is not necessarily the same as that
which was used for <varargs.h>, you have to go through the code and
fix it anyway.  Adding a dummy argument to those functions should
not be much more work than you already have to do.