Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!olivea!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!sarah!bingnews!kym
From: kym@bingvaxu.cc.binghamton.edu (R. Kym Horsell)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Strings as function names (again)
Message-ID: <1991Feb8.181146.25383@bingvaxu.cc.binghamton.edu>
Date: 8 Feb 91 18:11:46 GMT
References: <388@bria> <14972@smoke.brl.mil> <wolfram.666028267@ikki>
Organization: State University of New York at Binghamton
Lines: 12

In article <wolfram.666028267@ikki> wolfram@ikki.informatik.rwth-aachen.de (Wolfram Roesler) writes:
>gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn) writes:
>
>>One is that you have to tell it a path to the executable file, and
>>that is not in general available for the currently-executing process.
>
>Sure? How about argv[0] ?

Sure! What about execXXX -- it's only a _convention_ that argv[0]
is installed as any kind of filename.

-kym