Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!ists!yunexus!oz
From: oz@yunexus.yorku.ca (Ozan Yigit)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: On whether ... [urp]
Message-ID: <21635@yunexus.YorkU.CA>
Date: 6 Feb 91 20:11:03 GMT
References: <29224:Feb419:06:0191@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <1991Feb5.144815.23239@spool.cs.wisc.edu> <1234:Feb520:27:2391@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <1991Feb6.161639.18311@spool.cs.wisc.edu>
Sender: news@yunexus.YorkU.CA
Organization: York U. Communications Research & Development
Lines: 15


In article <1991Feb6.161639.18311@spool.cs.wisc.edu> quale@picard.cs.wisc.edu
[Douglas E. Quale] bravely writes [regarding Dan's claims]:

>I'm quite certain that you are completely, absolutely and undisputedly wrong.

Doug, you must surely know that Daniel J. Bernstein (tm) is never, ever
wrong, and even if he was wrong about 70% of the time, having him admit
to that would be as hard [or as easy ;-)] as finding a solution for the
halting problem. 

oz
---
We only know ... what we know, and    | Internet: oz@nexus.yorku.ca 
that is very little. -- Dan Rather    | UUCP: utzoo/utai!yunexus!oz