Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!ogicse!iwarp.intel.com!news
From: merlyn@iwarp.intel.com (Randal L. Schwartz)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.perl
Subject: Re: Patterns vs Strings
Message-ID: <1991Feb7.220532.26408@iwarp.intel.com>
Date: 7 Feb 91 22:05:32 GMT
References: <121642@uunet.UU.NET> <1991Feb07.210023.8308@convex.com>
Sender: news@iwarp.intel.com
Reply-To: merlyn@iwarp.intel.com (Randal L. Schwartz)
Organization: Stonehenge; netaccess via Intel, Beaverton, Oregon, USA
Lines: 14
In-Reply-To: tchrist@convex.COM (Tom Christiansen)

In article <1991Feb07.210023.8308@convex.com>, tchrist@convex (Tom Christiansen) writes:
|		     I don't think you can use m`bar` for qx// action, but
| neither can I think of why you'd ever want it to.

1) It works.  (Well, the s`foo`bar` form works.)

2) For a JAPH, of course!

s`^`echo Just another Perl hacker, >&2`;
-- 
/=Randal L. Schwartz, Stonehenge Consulting Services (503)777-0095 ==========\
| on contract to Intel's iWarp project, Beaverton, Oregon, USA, Sol III      |
| merlyn@iwarp.intel.com ...!any-MX-mailer-like-uunet!iwarp.intel.com!merlyn |
\=Cute Quote: "Intel: putting the 'backward' in 'backward compatible'..."====/