Xref: utzoo misc.consumers:26739 comp.org.eff.talk:1389 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!fxgrp!raphael From: raphael@fx.com (Glen Raphael) Newsgroups: misc.consumers,comp.org.eff.talk Subject: Re: Advertising is bad Keywords: DMA Suppression junk-mail recycling activism Message-ID: <1991Feb6.214220.26996@fxgrp.fx.com> Date: 6 Feb 91 21:42:20 GMT References: <156215@felix.UUCP> <1991Feb1.054640.1441@cs.ucla.edu> <156606@felix.UUCP> <1991Feb5.192632.20536@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <1991Feb6.021812.14291@csrd.uiuc.edu> Sender: news@fxgrp.fx.com (News) Distribution: na Organization: FXD/Telerate, Mountain View, CA Lines: 34 midkiff@sp66.csrd.uiuc.edu (Sam Midkiff) writes: >spm2d@newton.acc.Virginia.EDU (Steven P. Miale) writes: >>In article <156606@felix.UUCP> asylvain@felix.UUCP (Alvin "the Chipmunk" Sylvain) writes: >... lots of stuff deleted ... >>> >>>(I say "if it's a good idea", because people are often surprised to find >>>out that it's not always a good idea. It frequently happens that reducing >>>the price of an item also reduces demand.) >>Reducing price reduces demand. Contrary to what EVERY SINGLE ECONOMICS >>TEXTBOOK IN THE HISTORY OF MANKIND HAS SAID, you have just really stuck >>your foot in your mouth. OK, if this is true, then raising prices increases >>demand, eh? DUMB, DUMB, DUMB. >Actually, for some "luxury" items, price decreases can lead to decreased >demand, since part of the reason of owning the item is to show that you >can afford such an expensive thing. Also, some people with more money than >time will buy the most expensive item under the assumption that it is the >best, or at least good enough. And finally, when the price of silver >skyrocketed some years ago, demand for silver bullion increased as people >tried to get in on a "good thing." When the price began to plummet, demand >dropped accordingly - so much so that silver now only sells for about 10% of >its peak price. There is also the phenomenon of "inferior goods". Suppose Susan would like to buy steak but can only afford hamburger and therefore eats hamburger 7 nights a week. If you lower the cost of hamburger, with the money Susan saves on hamburger 6 nights a week she can afford to buy steak or lobster on the seventh night. So by lowering the price of hamburger you have lowered the demand for hamburger. Glen Raphael raphael@fx.com