Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!MSC.EDU!tjs
From: tjs@MSC.EDU (Tim Salo)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: Pros/Cons of TCP+Router vs. X.25
Message-ID: <9102071854.AA14699@uh.msc.umn.edu>
Date: 7 Feb 91 18:54:54 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 8

> However, the original question did not indicate whether the proposed 
> solution was a public X.25 network or a private X.25 network.  

I am about to stand corrected, (the proposed solution was a public X.25
network).

> If the proposed solution is a private, (rather than public), X.25 network,
> then per-packet charges are most likely not an issue.