Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!clyde.concordia.ca!nstn.ns.ca!news.cs.indiana.edu!sdd.hp.com!usc!orion.oac.uci.edu!easu052
From: easu052@orion.oac.uci.edu (Thu Ra Tin)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: A3000UX - Born to run UNIX SVR4
Message-ID: <27B3D422.3211@orion.oac.uci.edu>
Date: 9 Feb 91 10:51:14 GMT
References: <581.27a97594@vger.nsu.edu> <8298@ucdavis.ucdavis.edu> <hunter.665900413@thomas>
Organization: University of California, Irvine
Lines: 19

In article <hunter.665900413@thomas> hunter@bacchus.esa.oz.au (James Gardiner [hunter]) writes:
>In <8298@ucdavis.ucdavis.edu> zerkle@iris.ucdavis.edu (Dan Zerkle) writes:
>
>>>compact.... The Amiga 3000UX greatly outperforms the equivalent
>>>NeXT and Macintosh with A/UX... it is an obvious choice as a low-end
>>>workstation."
>
>>What do you mean by "outperforms?"  The equivalent NeXT has a 68040
>>and inarguably better sound and screen resolution (no color, though).
>>Good thing this is in a quote.
>

>James Gardiner [Hunter][hunter@bacchus.esa.oz.au]    Expert Solutions Australia
>                 UUCP: ...!uunet!munnari!hunter@bacchus.esa.oz.au  
>                   ARPA: hunter%bacchus.esa.oz.AU@uu



That was a statement in BYTE previewing Amiga3000 UX.