Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!psuvax1!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!ccwf.cc.utexas.edu
From: greg@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Greg Harp)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: Why all of this NeXT talk?
Keywords: A3000UX NeXT stop rediculous
Message-ID: <43980@ut-emx.uucp>
Date: 10 Feb 91 10:18:12 GMT
References: <1991Feb9.083920.27791@en.ecn.purdue.edu> <1531@pdxgate.UUCP>
Sender: news@ut-emx.uucp
Reply-To: greg@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Greg Harp)
Distribution: usa
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin
Lines: 24

In article <1531@pdxgate.UUCP> hal@eecs.UUCP (Aaron Harsh) writes:
>In article <1991Feb9.083920.27791@en.ecn.purdue.edu> doctorj@en.ecn.purdue.edu 
  (Jeffrey W Davis) writes:
>>Imagine an
>>Amiga running Unix on multiple T800 processors!?  If you want number
>>crunching... you got it!
>
>  Do you think that Commodore has developed a UNIX to run on multiple
>T800 processors?  Do you think Commodore will ever develop one?
                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This is from a man who just a post or two ago said that NeXT wasn't going
to limit themselves to the 680x0 architecture.  BTW, the multiple T800
board isn't vaporware, either.  It's called the SANG board.

>Aaron Harsh
>hal@eecs.cs.pdx.edu

Greg

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I don't know what it is I like about you, but I like it a lot." --
                                         Led Zeppelin, Communication Breakdown
-------Greg-Harp-------greg@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu-------s609@cs.utexas.edu-------