Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!hybrid!scifi!bywater!uunet!tnc!m0154 From: m0154@tnc.UUCP (GUY GARNETT) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.datacomm Subject: Re: Modem problems Message-ID: <706@tnc.UUCP> Date: 5 Feb 91 15:06:36 GMT References: <43260@nigel.ee.udel.edu> <764@faatcrl.UUCP> <578.27a92c1b@vger.nsu.edu> Reply-To: m0154@tnc.UUCP (GUY GARNETT) Organization: The Next Challenge, Fairfax, Va. Lines: 24 In article <578.27a92c1b@vger.nsu.edu> manes@vger.nsu.edu ((Mark D. Manes), Norfolk State University) writes: >In article , t22918@ursa (Matt Ranney ) writes: >> wrong, but when you only have a meg of mem, using up half of it just to >> DL some stuff in the background is kinda expensive. But you can't design >> a different version for every user out there, so I guess I'll just have to >> live with it (or buy more mem). >go ahead an add a few more features to JR-Comm. For example scripting and >a built in BBS emulator. I would love to see a editable review buffer as >well. We need a _Full_ featured terminal program. I grow tired of the >anemic terminal software that exists for the Amiga. I use Jr-Comm >almost exclusively unless I really need to do some kermit transfers. > Don't put in scripting! Put in an AREXX port! It should only add a few kbytes to the program ... that would solve the scripting and bbs emulator requests. An editable review buffer would be nice, too :) Wildstar (sorry about butchering the .sig files, but my site has a rule about replies - they get sent to dead.letter unless there is more new text than quoted text. All things considered, not a bad rule! :)