Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!usc!ucselx!maxc0415
From: maxc0415@ucselx.sdsu.edu (Amiga Universe II)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
Subject: Imploder vs. PowerPacker
Message-ID: <1991Feb7.172728.16199@ucselx.sdsu.edu>
Date: 7 Feb 91 17:27:28 GMT
Organization: San Diego State University Computing Services
Lines: 18


	Hello World!

I like to compress executable files on my startup disk;  This allow me to put
considerable more stuffs on it.   

So I used PowerPacker and Imploder to acheive this.   But, which one is better?

Both Imploder and PowerPacker now supports their own powerpacker.library and
explode.library.   But imploder claim that they have a better consideration on
the system's environment.   I don't know about powerpacker.

Imploder have a nice bar graphic, and friendy interface.  and I like that better
then the powerpacker.   

If you used these programs.  please leave me your opinions.  Thank you.

	p.s.	How do I use the 'music' option in the 'TurboImploder'?