Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!wuarchive!csus.edu!ucdavis!monet.ucdavis.edu!ez002266
From: ez002266@monet.ucdavis.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
Subject: Re: Imploder vs. PowerPacker
Message-ID: <1991Feb7.152324@monet.ucdavis.edu>
Date: 7 Feb 91 23:23:24 GMT
References: <1477@pdxgate.UUCP> <1991Feb7.172728.16199@ucselx.sdsu.edu>
Sender: usenet@aggie.ucdavis.edu
Reply-To: ez002266@monet.ucdavis.edu ()
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Lines: 10

Definitely use Imploder instead of PowerPacker.
Imploder compresses faster
Imploder decompresses TWICE AS FAST
Imploder consistently makes smaller compressed files
Imploder is way cool!

There is supposed to be an even more cool Version 4.0 of Imploder coming out
soon.

-bruce